GAO wants more quality considerations injected into survey process. Hospice surveys are under fire again, this time from the Government Accountability Office. Like with a pair of HHS Office of Inspector General reports released this summer, a new GAO report calls into question Medicareâs oversight of hospices via surveys. Unlike the earlier OIG reports, the GAO document does not include survey horror stories such as patients with maggot-infested wounds or gangrenous limb amputations after wound care neglect, which grab national headlines (see Eliâs HCW, Vol. XVIII, No. 24). âThankfully, the most recent report doesnât include another âparade of horribles,ââ says Washing- ton, D.C.-based healthcare attorney Elizabeth Hogue. The GAO report looks at current Hospice Quality Reporting Program quality measures, noting that for- and nonprofits had comparable scores on the seven measures. The data shows that hospices in general performed well on the QMs, points out attorney Robert Markette Jr. with Hall Render in Indianapolis. GAO staff found bigger differences be- tween profit types on âpotential indicators of qualityâ it generated from interviewing a âsample of researchersâ and reviewing ârelevant research studies,â according to the report released Nov. 14. Those indicators were: A high live discharge rate âcould indicate dissatisfaction with care leading to the beneficiaryâs decision to leave the hospice provider,â the GAO argues. Providing visits in the last three days of life, âa critical time in providing quality care,â can represent a hospiceâs âmedical and emotional supportâ in that time. âFor-profits had higher rates of live discharges than nonprofits, with 22.1 percent of beneficiaries served by for-profits being discharged alive compared to 12.0 percent of beneficiaries served by non-profits in 2017,â GAO researchers found. âThis disparity remained true after accounting for whether benefiÂciaries had a cancer or non-cancer diagnosis.â For visits in the last seven days of life, âfor-profits and non-profits both averaged about 6 provider visitsâ in 2017, the GAO notes. But for the last three days, for-profits fell behind their non-profit peers for skilled visits â 77 percent versus 85 percent. Non-skilled visits were the opposite, however â 68 percent versus 57 percent. Conclusion: âWhile [the Centers for Medi- care & Medicaid Services] instructs surveyors to review previous survey findings and complaints, CMS does not instruct surveyors to use information on providersâ performance on quality measures or other potential indicators of quality as part of the survey process,â the GAO says. âThis information could be used to enhance the survey process.â The GAO also laments that CMS has only termination as an enforcement option â a criticism shared by earlier OIG reports. And CMS uses termination only ârarely,â the GAO adds. Recommendation: CMS should incorporate QMs and other quality indicators into its survey process, the GAO urges. Congress also should grant CMS the authority to use alternative sanctions, such as those used for home health agencies and nursing homes. âMeaningful quality measures can also serve as key indicators of provider quality,â the Department of Health and Human Services agrees in its comments on the report. âWe will look into ways to incorporate the use of this meaningful quality measure data into the hospice survey process,â HHS says, referring to Hospice Compare data. GAO May Want Minimum Visit Target Yet more focus on hospice surveys means they are likely to get even tougher, predicts attorney Meg S.L. Pekarske with Reinhart Boerner Van Deuren in Madison, Wisconsin. âWe have seen a rise in survey intensity since before the OIG report and expect it will continue,â Pekarske tells Eli. Keep in mind: âCMS had the OIG reports for internal review prior to release,â points out Theresa Forster with the National Association for Home Care & Hospice. Like home health before it, the hospice industry has been on an enforcement ramp-up as government agencies churn out reports focusing on suspected fraud and abuse in the sector, Markette contends. And hospices can expect to see the enforcement efforts continue to intensify (see related story, p. 339). This GAO report has some problems, however, experts counter. For one, QMs are not Conditions of Participation, Hogue says, and surveyors arenât trained on them. âPatients may pass away suddenly and unexpectedly so that the lack of visits during the 3 days prior to death may not be indicative of a lack of quality care,â Hogue offers. Or âsuppose the family doesnât want or need visits within the 3 days prior to death?â Patients and their loved ones may not want visits from any hospice staff members during the final days, âespecially if symptoms and pain are well-controlled,â she adds. Effectively mandating a âminimum visit frequencyâ for unnecessary or unwanted visits is short-sighted and could be costly, Hogue indicates. Live discharges also donât necessarily mean poor quality care, Markette says. Sometimes, if palliative care improves a patientâs health so that she now exceeds the six-month prognosis, a live discharge could actually indicate good quality care, he points out. CMS notes that âmeaningfulâ quality data is useful. But the âpotential indicatorsâ the GAO uses could mean any number of things, experts charge. Plus: âAttempts to use quality data by surveyors will almost inevitably result in subjective conclusions that may be very unfair to providers,â Hogue warns. And another thing: Even focusing on survey data to indicate quality has its pitfalls, Markette argues. Surveys are inherently subjective, which is evidenced by the citation statistics that vary greatly from state to state. Add to that, hospices donât have an avenue to appeal or even really address citations they donât agree with unless they are put on the termination track, Markette says. Survey findings are often seen as the result of a fact-finding process, but they are much more subjective and really should be considered more like allegations, he contends. Given surveysâ gray areas, âitâs unfair to base policies on survey findings,â Markette believes. Note: The 41-page report is at .